Blockchain in an Enterprise Setting - a Ten Thousand Foot View

Clayton Rothschild
Associate, Houston Office


The best use-cases for blockchain are in business processes that involve multiple parties, are transactional, and involve reconciliation or arbitration.

Few technologies present opportunities for disruptive innovation better than Blockchain. Such technology, often referred to as a Distributed Ledger Technology, allows businesses to communicate with less friction and more trust.1 Businesses are rightly curious how this technology may breathe new life into their work flows.

I will assume my reader has a basic understanding of blockchain, and is looking for a practical next step of how this technology may find its home in their company. For those uninitiated, I will skip the technical details and simply say this: The simplest way to view blockchain is as a next generation database. Blockchains are immutable databases that record transactions securely. Such a product allows for smoother communication and improved governance and security. Implications exist for the Energy industry, which I will outline below.

Blockchain – that’s still a thing?

Tim Grant, CEO of R3, gave a great timeline of where we are at with distributed ledger technology:

2014: The year of enlightenment
2015: The Year of the Hype
2016: The Year of the PoC
2017: The Year of the Pilot
2018: The Year of Production

An enterprise can be a fast-follower or a leader. But you can’t be a fast follower during a paradigm shift. And we are in the middle of a paradigm shift.  You can’t sit on the sidelines.2

Ready to get off the sidelines? Here are three questions you may be asking: What types of use cases are useful for blockchain technology? How can I sell blockchain to stakeholders? And finally, what are the “bewares” and risks of implementing blockchain?

What types of use cases are useful for blockchain?

Blockchain is as revolutionary as they say. It will reshape entire industries. It does have implications for almost every business process. However, it must continue to evolve.

It is easy for a forward-looking project manager to become overwhelmed by every promise blockchain offers. It has an implication for seemingly every problem domain out there. But here’s the current reality: Blockchain is sometimes a hammer looking for a nail.

While I, and many others, believe that blockchain will eventually become an underpinning layer of the Internet, one must look at the “low-hanging fruit” when implementing distributed ledger technology for the first-time in an enterprise setting. Yes, eventually everything will run on blockchain, but we need to prove out technology first, and there are certain project types that lend themselves well as a good candidate for a first time blockchain implementation.

The best candidate project will utilize distributed ledger technology not simply because of its technical superiority, but because of the superior operational workflow it enables.Implementation of blockchain should create business value. The end result should save time, remove cost, and reduce risk.

Processes ripe for this tech are therefore those that involve multiple parties, are transactional, and have an element that involves reconciliation, arbitration, or intermediation. In an enterprise setting, the process should probably involve a cost-center rather than revenue – it comes with less risk and is an easier sell to key stakeholders and regulators.

Consider your organization. Where does there exist silo’d systems, manual processes, and lack of transparency? Where are there many disjunct data sources or legacy systems?

One example is settlements and reconciliation in energy trading and risk management. Energy trading is composed of transactions that are tracked by multiple counterparties, in a manual process under regulatory and compliance scrutiny. Settlement takes almost a month after a commodity is consumed, and reconciliation occurs over the next six months. Hundreds of people are involved. That’s a lot of room for capital efficiency.

Reconciliation is costly. According to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, some 1600 people are employed by the average bank to assist with reconciliation each year. This costs the banking industry some ~$15B.3

There will certainly be revenue opportunities from Distributed Ledger Technology, and we will find those as the ecosystem evolves. But in the meantime, we have our hands full in cost saving activities alone. Reduction of reconciliation and remediation processes can create huge cost savings. Start there.

Still stuck? Here’s a hit list of use cases in oil and gas and electricity:

Each of these will benefit from immutability, a secure data repository, and operational efficiencies from reduced dispute resolution. Best of all, blockchain is being abstracted enough that we can take a shadow approach – the user interface won’t change – just the plumbing.

These should perk your ears: Cost centers. Reconciliation and mediation. Manual processes. Multiple Parties.

How can I sell blockchain to stakeholders?

Perhaps you have identified a good candidate project and are ready to explore an implementation. But it sure does get confusing out there, doesn’t it? The product offerings are bewildering:

private or public blockchains?
open-source? Industry-specific DLTs?
Permissioned or permissionless?

If I have a project selected, how do I actually “make blockchain happen” and avoid paralysis by analysis?

To the CTO overwhelmed and confused on how to navigate this crowded environment, I would simply offer the following words of comfort.

The POC comes before the pilot which comes before the product.

This is your development path. And we know that following such a path allows one to change direction before the digital concrete is poured.

And if we begin with a POC, the stakes are low. You can “prove-out” and see in a tangible way whether public/private and permissioned/permission less chains are optimal, and then you can choose one for the next stage: the pilot.  If our candidate project truly solves operational or financial inefficiencies, then we should have a clear definition of success by which we can choose the most optimal technology for our final product.

Another encouragement to those stuck in analysis: perhaps it is more useful to find the optimal vendor rather than to identify the optimal technology. What will sit better with your project sponsor – a pure, open-source, technically rich solution, or an offering from a trusted and familiar brand? Many blockchain purists decry projects like HyperLedger, but what will be easier to sell to the business stakeholder: an URL to a github repo or a salesdeck from IBM?

Finally, a major trend in distributed ledger technology is the preponderance of consortiums and partnerships. Leverage these. An organization may benefit from exploring this nascent technology with another player in their industry. Partnerships such as the Hyperledger Foundation and Ethereum Enterprise Alliance exist to help facilitate the exploration of this tech with like-minded industry leaders.

What are the risks?

Finally, I present this list of “bewares” and “gotchas” from a business perspective. Lists of technical risks abound, but if you are ready to explore a blockchain implementation, you should be mindful of these practical considerations.

The uses for blockchain span multiple domains. Eventually, blockchain will be ubiquitous. But, for those of us in the real world, right now, we need to focus on the projects that will create the most business value. The best project candidates are those that involve multiple parties and involve processes that need reconciliation and arbitration. Supply Chain and settlements processes are often the first place to look. Enterprises should do what they can to be a leader in their industry in this space, and the ecosystem lends itself to enabling these innovators to succeed. Good luck!


  1. Less Friction and More Trust is a description coined by IBM.
  2. Thanks to Tim Grant for this verbage, which was presented at Business and the Blockchain Conference at Rice University, April 23, 2017.
  3. Statistic presented by Sandra Ro, Director at Chicago Mercantile Exchange, at the Business and the Blockchain Conference at Rice University, April 23, 2017.


*This article was originally written on Clayton's website, Specific Generalist.

Clayton Rothschild

About the Author

He is passionate about his accessibility project, New Braille (, which aims to bring indoor GPS to blind students at universities everywhere. He is an early adopter of the Ethereum blockchain, creating a Proof of Concept democratic voting app and presenting on the disruptive nature of blockchains back in 2015 ( He is an accountant turned software engineer that works in consulting. I write about Swift, C#, Microsoft Azure, Agile, and everything in between at!

by Phillip Manwaring
Let Serverless Solve the Tech Problems You Don't Have
By Tim Hurst
Unlocking Marketing ROI Analytics
By Sean McCall
The Missing Link in Advanced Analytics
By Collins DeLoach
What does Cloud Transformation mean it IT?
By Jeff Townes
Transforming Your Operating Model for the Cloud
by Brian Duperrouzel
Hippos and Cows are Stopping Your Machine Learning Projects
by Mike Strange
DevOps a Practical Framework for Technology Process and Organizational Change
by Oussama Housini
Why DevOps?
By Jack Warner
Building Smart Deployment Pipeline
By Ryan Gross
What Does It Really Mean to Operationalize a Predictive Model
By Marc Helberg
How AI Will Affect Your Patient’s Experience
By Ryan McFarland
Machine Learning, Beyond the Stars!
By Alan Henson
Artificial Intelligence Might Be Your Toughest Employee to Manage
By Derrick Bowen
Stop Complaining About Changing Requirements
by Clayton Rothschild
Blockchain in an Enterprise Setting
by Julio Santos
Context as Currency
by Dave Winterhalter
Data in the Dugout
by Adrian Kosiak
Lessons from Dior on Becoming a Premium Brand
By Marc Helberg
3 Ways You Can Begin to Take Patient Experience More Seriously
By Margaret Rogers
Identifying the Value of Nonprofit Customer Experience
By Margaret Scovern
Flexible Data Pipelines: The Key to Competitiveness in the Data Age
By Margaret Rogers
Why an Agile Mindset is at the Root of an Excellent Guest Experience
By Sean Beard
What Does ‘Disruptive’ Really Mean?
by Ryan Gross
The Rise of DataOps from the Ashes of Data Governance
<p>Dimitrios Vilaetis and Sara Harshbarger</p>
Holistic Value Hunting
by C<span>&eacute;</span>sar Giralt
Building your Alumni Network into a Value Creation Platform
by Russell Clarkson
Mark Your Exits
By Russell Clarkson
Is your Ecosystem a pipeline or a platform?
by Kent Norman and Kevin Moormann
I’ll be Home in Five Story-points
by Susan Paul
Capabilities as Building Blocks
By Mike Strange
4 Reasons to Leverage the Power of Small Teams
By Susan Paul
When Corporate Culture Undermines IT Success
By Alexandria Johnson
The Hottest Thing at SXSW You Learned it in Kindergarten
By Bruce Ballengee
Developing the Individual
By Allison Esenkova
Wearing Heels to the Top
by Lori Dipprey
Why Performance Review are Here to Stay at Pariveda
by Kerry Stover
I Know You Believe You Understood What You Think I Said
by David Watson
4 Lessons Learned from Questions
by Bruce Ballengee
Teaching Roots Run Deep
By Carrie Beckner
Generation Z’s Members Are Entering the Workforce. Here’s How to Welcome Them.
By Russell Clarkson
Stand Up for Good Presentations
By Margaret Rogers
Failing Fast Is Fine — As Long As You’re Failing Well, Too
Load More